Phantasypublishing LLC

  Most likely answer in my opinion is that human inventors have some experimental vehicles that are so secret that even the regular Navy is unaware of their existence. Do we really believe the SR71 and the F117 were retired with no replacements entering service? These vehicles could be far more maneuverable than anything Naval aviators have seen. And as for making high G maneuvers, simple answer is they are unmanned. I sleep better at night believing that the US military is flying these unidentified flying objects. That's my humble opinion                 Turbine Based Combined Cycle (TBCC) NASA has funded a parametric design study by Lockheed Martin to establish the viability of a Turbine Based Combined Cycle (TBCC) Propulsion system consisting of integrating several combinations of near-term turbine engine solutions and a very low Mach ignition Dual Mode RamJet (DMRJ) in the SR-72 vehicle concept. The SR-72 would fly at speeds of Mach 6.0. ...

Finally, confirmation of what has been known for now 60 years if you are building advanced joint operation aircraft, they aren't going to look like regular aircraft but advance into looking like something out of a science fiction movie.

  Considering the magnitude and physics of the collapse it would be a good chance some individuals may have ridden it down to their deaths. The sheer kinetic forces of impact emulsified most remains. Between Floors, if you did not make it to the stairwell like the individuals that rode stairwell B down. from this angle, you see the impact into wtc 7 of upper floors you can’t see the damage from this direction. But you can see the core columns near the stairwells still there at this point the remaining structure is falling into the basement levels like a piledriver and this means the parking garage is already cut off so anyone in the mechanical core or main plant are walking dead. The same if they are in part of the basement that did not collapse as it is buried an now smoke from the server Farms and UPS system fires are now entering that area added by secondary fires from vehicles burning in the underground garages also you can feel the air pressure increase. Nearer to the PATH sta...

  Daniel Henson The Problem of Predisposition (Why you must approach your faith of choice with objectivity and skepticism and not confirmation bias) I. The theist defines a god. He defines his nature, his character, his actions and concerns. II. The theist rejects thousands of other definitions of god without considering most of them. A. Pagan gods such as Abellio the Celtic tree god, or Malakbel the the Arabian vegetation god. B. Modern gods (Islam, Hinduism, Taoism, Judaism) C.    Essentially, everyone is an “atheist” towards all gods except their own III. There are billions of people who reject the theist’s particular definition of god, who have as little regard for the theists definition of god as he does for their definition of god(s). IV. The theist’s choices in defining god are very likely determined by culture, accident of birth, and childhood indoctrination. A. This is evidenced by localized religions, such as salt lake city's Mormons, the bible bel...