Phantasypublishing LLC

What if a Chinese person were to marry a Polynesian, or an African with black skin were to marry a Japanese—would these marriages be in accord with biblical principles? The tragic legacy of Darwin’s controversial speculations on evolution has led to terrible consequences taken to the deadliest extremes. One Race One Blood reveals the origins of these horrors, as well as the truth revealed in Scripture that God created only one race. A significant number of Christians would claim that such “interracial” marriages directly violate God’s principles in the Bible and should not be allowed. Does the Word of God really condemn the marriages mentioned above? Is there ultimately any such thing as interracial marriage? To answer these questions, we must first understand what the Bible and science teach about “race.” What Constitutes a “Race”? In the 1800s, before Darwinian evolution was popularized, most people, when talking about “races,” would be referring to such

Mich When she tried to use it as an excuse again and challenged this U.S. Marine, his response set her straight. Here’s the letter to Michelle Obama: Mrs. Obama, It sickens me that I have to take time to write you this letter. I am a Marine who doesn’t recognize color because every color has lived and died for you. You live in a free country to blame your life on the color of another man’s skin. All colors have given their lives for an educated woman to have the freedom to be so ignorant. I don’t blame black people for the ignorance that comes from your mouth. I love all colors because I love all that God creates. I don’t have to like you to love you because we can’t always like the ones we love. Just because I don’t like you today doesn’t mean I can’t like you tomorrow. I don’t like you or your husband today because of what you’re doing to this country. Isn’t it funny how the truth always reveals itself in time. You and your husband never showed this side of yourselves in 2

Warning   : as   this post   by Pier Paolo Murru on Luogocomune, point out that the article subject of this analysis has been withdrawn by the author following the reporting of errors that it contained. . = <> = . The inspiration for this article I was given by the publication of analyzes of Pier Paolo Murru to statements of   Popular Mechanics   of the surveillance cameras in the Pentagon who have taken the impact at the building on 11 September 2001. Deliberately I do not mention what would have impacted the Pentagon, although for myself is now clear that it was the Flight 77, but for the purposes of my counter-analysis of Murru statements, it is not important. The original article was found   here   , but was removed by its author and is no longer available online. The title chosen by Murru summarizes us the hypothesis that the author wants to support:   "False Evidence 1: Popular Mechanics"   . The Book of   Popular Mechanics   , whose Ital