Phantasypublishing LLC

Warning   : as   this post   by Pier Paolo Murru on Luogocomune, point out that the article subject of this analysis has been withdrawn by the author following the reporting of errors that it contained. . = <> = . The inspiration for this article I was given by the publication of analyzes of Pier Paolo Murru to statements of   Popular Mechanics   of the surveillance cameras in the Pentagon who have taken the impact at the building on 11 September 2001. Deliberately I do not mention what would have impacted the Pentagon, although for myself is now clear that it was the Flight 77, but for the purposes of my counter-analysis of Murru statements, it is not important. The original article was found   here   , but was removed by its author and is no longer available online. The title chosen by Murru summarizes us the hypothesis that the author wants to support:   "False Evidence 1: Popular Mechanics"   . The Book of ...

. SECRECY NEWS From the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Volume 2016, Issue No. 18 February 24, 2016 Secrecy News Blog:   http://fas.org/blogs/ secrecy/ **     NEW DOE RULES ON CLASSIFIED HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH **     ARMY: RAPID REPROGRAMMING NEEDED FOR CYBER OPS NEW DOE RULES ON CLASSIFIED HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH The Department of Energy last month issued new  guidance  on the conduct of classified scientific research involving human subjects. While all human subject research is governed by federal regulations, the  new DOE policy imposes several additional requirements whenever such research is to be performed on a classified basis. For example, the proposed classified research must be reviewed and approved in advance by an Institutional Review Board, and the Board must include a non-scientist member and a member who is not a governmental employee (though he or she must hold a security clearance...

This question I'm often made by those who approach for the first time to the analysis of the attack on the Pentagon on 11 September 2001. I will try to give an answer. In the book  "Debunking Myths 911"  , in Chapter 3, it is addressed the subject of surveillance cameras in the Pentagon and the analysis of the question movies released by the DoD (Department of Defense) following the conclusion of the Moussaoui trial.  . These movies, since their release, were the subject of many criticisms and analysis, because in fact the general public expectation of seeing a plane crash into the Pentagon, similar to what is seen in many movies taken from different angles the impact of the Boeing 767 against the South Tower, has been disappointed. . In the movie you see a widespread impact, followed by an explosion and subsequent development of a huge cloud of flames, but a plane, as would be expected commonly to see him, not even a shadow.  But are we really sure ...