- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Meet David L. Griscom: a research physicist, retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service.
He studied "Effervescent Magnetic Peroxyborates:"http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ja01033a010
He also contends that thermite, a welding material, can turn buildings into dust.
Are you seeing a pattern yet?
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Ryan G Banister The evidence offered in support of any claim must be exhaustive — that is all of the available evidence must be considered. This includes NIST findings and the straight forward recovery of all the WTC steel For obvious reasons, it is never reasonable to consider only the evidence that supports a theory and to discard the evidence that contradicts it. This rule is straightforward and self-apparent, and it requires little explication or justification.
ReplyDeleteIn Dr woods presentation The rule of honesty is a corollary to the rule of comprehensiveness. When you have examined all of the evidence, it is essential that you be honest with yourself about the results of that examination. If the weight of the evidence contradicts the claim, then you are required to abandon belief in that claim. In This case he claim of directed energy destruction of WTC is false and should be abandoned as all physical evidence of the incidint contradicts her false claims.