The Air Force and the National Security Space Program 1946 - 1988 ...
Within the next few years United States political and
military leaders will be setting the course of military space
operations for the future. They will determine national space
policy objectives, the attendant strategy, the mix of space forces
required, and the military doctrine for employing these forces. A
thorough understanding of astronautical history is thus crucial if
these decisions are to be reasoned and informed, the more likely to
increase national security and reduce the prospects of armed
conflict than they are to imperil command and country. With the
thought of contributing to that understanding, at the request of
the Office of Air Force History, through the Office of the
Secretary of the Air Force, I undertook this brief history of the
United States Air Force and the national security space program,
1946-1986. Officials in the Air Force and the National
Reconnaissance Office decided on classifying this work at the TK
level so that it could be made available to a larger number ot
people directly involved in space program planning and flight
operations.
bomb.
(G) In 1949 Soviet scientists successfully tested an atomic
That test ended the American nuclear monopoly and it
encouraged the building of even more awesome thermonuclear weapons.
It also caused American leaders in the early 1950s to judge an
atomic: s:_;rprise attack on this country to be a distinct and
terrifyi~g possibility. A nuclear Pearl Harbor, all could agree,
had so~ehow to be precluded; more tha~ ever before, forewarned
meant forearmed. Early warning of a surprise attack, that is a
war~ing days or weeks in advance, could only be secured t~rough
TOP SECHE'T'
HA:,DLE VIA T."rLEH'f' J(2rHo::-_.E
CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY
Vlll
NRO Approved for Release
Declassified by: C/IRRG
Declassified on: 30 June 2014 crop SECHET
HAN"DLE VIA WtLEUT KEYHIOLE
CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY
overhead reconnu 1 ssanc~e conduct cd from very gh altit This
r:at·onaJ requirement precipitated the U.S. military space prourarr:,
and in this history the Air Force in space, strategic
reconnaissance became quite naturally a principal focus of
attention.
+&t This history does not address military space programs
that are largely uncJassif ied, the communication and navigation
satellite efforts, for example; that activity is for the most part
avail e in the open literature. This is not exclusively an "Air
Force" history. Nor is it a technical history of reconnaissance
satellites or their missile-detection and meteorological con~anions
performing related defense-support funct in space. Rather,
s work addresses the Air Force role as.it evolved in the
military space program and the important political, military, and
policy issues that the en se at its hard core. I have
attempt to explain how and why American leaders began a n0t1
::>pace program, why they divided and zed it in military and
civil branches, and why the Air Force was appointed to manuge and
conduct--but not direct--much of the rn:ltion 1 s milit<;i:ry spacetaring.
I furt,her sought to plumb the reasoning behind early U.S. space
policy as it rela to national security space operations, and
analyze the profound ettects that reconnaissance scttellites have
had on ernat1onal tions during the lasl quarter ce~tury.
The st,udy is therefore broader in scope than the title alone mi
at (irst imp
: S /TIO A number of individuals contributed materially to
this , and I am indebted to them. Edward V. Stearns and
William W. Kellogg s~ared their recollections of the early days at
TOP SECRE'f'
Hl-'d-JDI,JE VIA WtDEl;':' J~EYIIGL::
CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY
lX
NRO Approved for Release
Declassified by: C/IRRG
Declassified on: 30 June 2014
TOP SEG&ET
HANDLE VIA PALEN'l' 1CBYHOLE
CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY
Rand and Lockheed; Larry E. Jenkins and Stanley I. Weiss of
Lockheed critiqued the Agena. story; Lt Col Donald B. Dodd, USAFR,
he:ped greatly with unclassified research; Donald Welzenbach of the
CIA.History Office counselled on technical details and critiqued
the draft chapters; Jimmie D. Hill of the National Reconnaissance
Office provided background on the NRO in an institutional setting;
and Colonel William Davidson .{SAF/AAZ) obtained key docwnents that
made this study possible. Finally, special thanks are owed -
and in the National Reconnaissance Office. 3.3 (b)(1)
Despite a full schedule, they conscientiously edited and typed the
manuscri.pt as an "additional duty." Any errors of omission or
commission that may remain are mine alone.
R. Cargill Hall
Washington DC
August 1988
More
http://www.governmentattic.org/12docs/USAFandNSecSpacePgm1946-1988.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment