Secrecy News: May 23, 2016

Secrecy News: May 23, 2016 View this email in your browser

SECRECY NEWS From the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Volume 2016, Issue No. 45 May 23, 2016 Secrecy News Blog:  http://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/ **     SOME STATE SECRETS CASES MAY STAY SECRET **     THE RICO STATUTES, AND MORE FROM CRS SOME STATE SECRETS CASES MAY STAY SECRET A definitive accounting of the number of lawsuits in which the U.S. Government has invoked the state secrets privilege cannot be provided because some of those cases may be too sensitive to acknowledge or disclose, the Department of Justice told Congress innewly released correspondence from 2013. "Some matters involving classified or sensitive information may need to be litigated under seal, and thus it should be noted that it may not be possible or appropriate for the Department to indicate the precise number or names of matters in which the Attorney General has approved the Department's defense of an invocation of the [state secrets] privilege," DoJ wrote in response to a question for the record from Rep. Jerrold Nadler following a June 2012 House Judiciary Committee hearing. The Department's answers to questions for the record from Rep. Nadler and others were released last week under the Freedom of Information Act. They did not appear in the published record of the June 7, 2012 House Judiciary Committee hearing because they were transmitted by DoJ too late to be included. The full exchange of questions and answers is available here. When a lawsuit involving state secrets raises credible allegations of government wrongdoing, it is DoJ policy to refer the allegations to the Department's Inspector General. However, DoJ rejected Rep. Nadler's request to identify whether or how often such cases had been referred. "The Department's policy is not to disclose referrals made to Inspectors General regarding possible misconduct of employees of other agencies or referrals to the Department's Office of Professional Responsibility. Consistent with that policy, we could not provide the number of cases, if any, that may have been referred to an IG pursuant to the Department's policy on the state secrets privilege," DoJ wrote. In 2011, the Department produced its first periodic report to Congress on the use of the state secrets privilege. "We expect a second report to be submitted in the near future," DoJ told Rep. Nadler. But no second report has been made available to date. DoJ did not evade all of Rep. Nadler's questions, however. The Congressman asked: "Can a judge disagree with the executive branch's decision as to whether the privilege is properly invoked?" And DoJ replied: "Yes. Reynolds provides that "[t]he court itself must determine whether the circumstances are appropriate for the claim of privilege." See 345 U.S. at 8." DoJ also indicated that the Attorney General approved the assertion of the state secrets privilege in six acknowledged cases between 2009 and 2013. One of the those cases,Roule v. Petraeus in the Northern District of California, has not been widely recognized as a state secrets case. In that proceeding, Walter Roule, a pseudonym for a covert CIA employee, alleged that he had been the object of employment discrimination because his wife was a foreign national of Asian ethnicity. The CIA moved to dismiss the case in July 2012 after then-CIA Director David Petraeus formally asserted the state secrets privilege. "I make this claim of privilege in my capacity as the Director of the CIA and after deliberation and personal consideration of the matter. My judgment in this matter necessarily rests on my knowledge of the vulnerability of our sources and methods, my experience, and the advice of other CIA professionals," DCIA Petraeus wrote. The case was dismissed by stipulation of the parties. Rep. Nadler reintroduced a bill last March to establish standards by which courts could evaluate government assertions of the state secrets privilege (H.R. 4767, the State Secrets Protection Act). But the legislation has not moved out of subcommittee. THE RICO STATUTES, AND MORE FROM CRS Last week, the House Appropriations Committee rejected two amendments to improve authorized public access to reports of the Congressional Research Service. However, unauthorized public access remains robust. The latest Congressional Research Service reports include the following. RICO: A Brief Sketch, May 18, 2016 Federal Reserve: Legislation in the 114th Congress, May 19, 2016 U.S.-EU Data Privacy: From Safe Harbor to Privacy Shield, May 19, 2016 Earthquake Risk and U.S. Highway Infrastructure: Frequently Asked Questions, May 19, 2016 Framing Spectrum Policy: Legislative Initiatives, May 18, 2016 The EMV Chip Card Transition: Background, Status, and Issues for Congress, May 17, 2016 Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy, May 17, 2016 Federal Student Aid: Need Analysis Formulas and Expected Family Contribution, May 18, 2016 The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's Five-Year Program for Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing: History and Proposed Program for 2017-2022, May 18, 2016 Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2015-FY2017), May 19, 2016 Waiting in Queue: Options for Addressing the Airport Screening Line Conundrum, CRS Insight, May 18, 2016. Despite its recognition that CRS has provided "tremendous value" to Congress, the Senate Appropriations Committee rejected a proposed $7.4 million increase in the CRS budget for 2017. "While the increase requested in fiscal year 2017 includes support for 22 additional full-time equivalents that purports to improve service to Congress, bringing on board new employees in the midst of this budget stagnation may not be a practical or cost-effective solution to optimize service," the Committee wrote last week. Instead of increased resources, the Senate Committee told CRS to tighten its belt. "The Committee directs CRS to examine ways in which the internal structure of the organization may be improved to meet the challenges of the ever-changing Congressional environment and provide a report to the Committee on a proposed restructuring within 120 days of enactment of this act. The report should include recommended changes to staffing, pay levels, the management structure, technology, and research priorities in order to create and support the workflow, products, and services that best meet Congress' needs." _____________________________________ Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists. The Secrecy News Blog is at:      http://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/