911truth.org scam

The 91101 terrorist attack was nothing more than a proxy attack on the united states using religious Crusaders as the actors of the Kamikaze attacks via hijacked airliners and religion to do the deed. This meant the primary proxies had ground support and established a network that would alert other United states Allies and nations whom would attempt to disrupt such attacks also they would and did go to the United States Government. Albright was the primary problem that prevented action or taking the warnings seriously in the 1990s in 1993 the first attempt was made via van bomb on the target. It failed so the second unstoppable Kamikaze attack route was taken. Infiltrate targeted airports place persons in key logistical areas then activate each component and strike. that is what happened on 9110 50 QUESTIONS FOR THE 911 TRUTH MOVEMENT: Since the govt. committed 9/11, why aren’t truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit? If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered? If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?"   Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud? If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat and stress loads 18 minutes after impact? How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?   Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?   Why won't Kevin Ryan allow ANY of his precious dust samples to be tested by an independent laboratory?   Why won't Niels Harrit, Steven Jones, or Kevin Ryan refute the recent truth seeking professional scientific study of the WTC dust performed by Dr. James Millette?   What did Hani Hanjour’s flight instructors have to say about his flying ability?   Who was Ali Mohamed and what is his relationship with Osama Bin Laden and the CIA?   How many of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's 2300+ architectural and engineering "professionals" have experience in structural engineering, high rise construction, or controlled demolition? How can Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth be considered a professional organization when over 80% of its members are students? How much of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's budget constitutes Richard Gage's salary?   Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?   What did the USA give the government of Pakistan concerning Bin Laden and 911 in early October of 2001?   How can Operation Northwoods be an example of "false flag terrorism" if it never happened?   Since WTC 7 was constructed over a Con Ed station, how did the structural framing compensate for the station and how did that influence the collapse?   How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?   If a postcard could survive the Hindenburg inferno isn't it possible for a passport to survive the WTC collapse? If it’s impossible for a jet to travel over 600 mph at sea level please explain EgyptAir flight 990? Since demolition experts estimated it would take over 100 men 4-6 months to place explosives in WTC 1, 2, & 7, how come no one witnessed any strange construction activity, wires, or boxes? How many times has Loose Change been edited for errors and re-released? If the US invaded Afghanistan to build an oil pipeline, please explain why there has been absolutely no construction on it in almost 15 years? How could Barry Jennings be murdered if he died of leukemia in a hospital?   If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?   If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?   How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?   If the ever so powerful govt. could commit and cover up 911, why did they have to destroy a building (WTC 7) just to destroy some documents?   Couldn't the govt. just haul the documents away and dump them into the ocean?   And do you really believe that those were the only copies?   If the Pentagon was hit by a missile and not a plane, what happened to the passengers and crew?   How many times did William Rodriguez change his 911 testimony?   If flight 77 was a missile and not a plane, what knocked down the pole lights outside the Pentagon?   Please explain how the words “stand down” were never even mentioned by Norman Mineta.   If Prescott Bush was a Nazi, how do you explain his fellow "Nazi" business partner Fritz Thyssen opposing the war in 1939, being expelled from the Nazi Party, and imprisoned in Sachsenhausen concentration camp?   If Prescott Bush was a Nazi, how do you explain him being cleared of all charges and allegations of Trading With the Enemy in 1942?   Since FEMA Appendix C references a temperature of 1800 degrees F how could it prove molten steel when it takes 2500 degrees F to melt steel? 911 TWOOFER: "A steel building has never collapsed due to fire." What happened to the Windsor Tower, Kadar Toy Factory, and the Delft Tower? Why doesn’t Steven Jones explain WHERE his WTC dust samples were stored between 2001 and 2007?   If FEMA Appendix C supposedly proves molten steel then why do the words “molten steel” NEVER even appear in the report?   How could the cell phone calls be fake on flight 93 when most of the calls were actually made from air phones on the seat backs and paid for with the passengers’ credit cards?   If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?   How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?   If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 3 hours before the actual collapse?   How could Larry Silverstein make “billions” off his insurance policy when he actually lost money after 911?   How long did it take to intercept Payne Stewart’s plane?   If Flight 77 didn’t hit the Pentagon, please explain the Dulles Int’l Airport security camera footage of Hani Hanjour on the morning of 911?   What was the Bojinka plot and what is it’s connection with the 911 attacks?   What did Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko say about WTC 1 and 2 before viewing a brief clip and asserting that WTC7 was a controlled demolition?



911truthers answer with strawman questions that all are anecdotal evidence that have been answered

-Why has NIST classified the data that they used to make their computer animation of the WTC7 collapse? Would knowledge of how NIST believes the building collapsed really “jeopardize public safety“? -Why did the DIA destroy more than 2.5 terabytes of data on their Able Danger investigation that reportedly identified four of the alleged hijackers years in advance of the attack? Why did the Pentagon buy up and burn the entire first print run of Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer’s book on the program? -Why did the SEC destroy their records on the 9/11 insider trading question, presumably the most important investigation in the agency’s history? -Why did the alleged “mastermind” of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, confess not only to plotting 9/11 “from A to Z” but also confess to masterminding numerous crimes that he could not have committed? -Why did Osama bin Laden repeatedly deny any involvement in the attacks until a series of mistranslated and otherwise manipulated videos came along appearing to portray him as taking credit for those attacks? -Why was the report of US State Department official Frank Taylor supposedly proving the case for Al Qaeda’s role in 9/11, which NATO used to justify its invasion of Afghanistan, presented in a classified briefing? Why is that report still classified to this day? -Why did the 9/11 commission rely so heavily on the confessions extracted through torture which even the Senate’s Armed Services committee points out is specifically used to extract false confessions? -Why did the CIA destroy 92 videotapes of their illegal torture sessions after being specifically ordered by a court not to do so? Why did the courts eventually absolve the CIA of any culpability for this crime? -Why did Donald Rumsfeld announce a new “war” on September 10, 2001? What was the reason for the 2.3 trillion missing dollars which the Pentagon claimed "could not be accounted" until that point, what did Rumsfeld’s “war on bureaucracy” hope to achieve, how was that “war” hindered when the budget analyst office in the Pentagon was destroyed the following morning, and where are the public records into this accounting scandal? -Why did Rumsfeld go into a regularly scheduled meeting with a CIA officer in his office on the morning of 9/11, after both of the Twin Towers had been struck by airplanes and it had been determined that “America was under attack.” Why did the highest ranking official in the US military remain in that meeting and unavailable for contact even by his highest staff members as the worst attack on US soil in history continued to unfold? Why did he suddenly come out for a photo op on the Pentalawn after the explosion instead of helping to coordinate the defense of the nation? -Why is there such a massive discrepancy between the 9/11 commission’s official finding of the time of entry of Dick Cheney into the Presidential Emergency Operation Center on the morning of 9/11 and Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta’s testimony of the timing of that arrival? -Why did the US government contract with Ptech, an enterprise architecture software firm, to install its backdoor access software on some of the most sensitive databases in the US government? -Why did they continue to use Ptech even after it was discovered that its sweetheart investor was a specially designated global terrorist on the Treasury’s own terror list? -Why did they declare that there was nothing untoward in the software mere hours after raiding Ptech’s offices in 2002? -What was Ptech doing in the basement of the Pentagon on 9/11? What interoperability tests was it running on the link between FAA and NORAD systems on 9/11, and how did that interfere with the FAA and NORAD’s response? -And, perhaps most tellingly of all, how did four highjacked aircraft fly so wildly off course for such lengthy periods of time without being confronted by a single fighter interceptor, and why did the Pentagon admittedly and on the record lie to the American public about the timilines of its response that day? Comprimi And while we are at it, give answer to the questions of 9/11 victims family members that have been poorly responded or totally ignored by the US govt and the US intelligence and investigation agencies, as you can see here:

http://www.911truth.org/images/resources/Family_Steering_Cmte-review_of_Report.pdf

****

The interesting thing is your source is not the survivors and victims of 91101 terror attacks.  911truth.org does not represent the victims or families of the 91101 

September 11 anniversary, some who hate Bush will gather in New York to profane the memory of the 3000 victims. They will try to convince the country that 9/11 was not an attack by Islamic terrorists, but criminal mass murder by the Bush Administration. Amazingly, fully one-third of Americans now believe that the government is guilty of some conspiracy concerning 9/11. Everything liberals believe about foreign policy was proven to be disastrously false on 9/11. Therefore, liberals must somehow deny that 9/11 actually happened.

After debating these characters extensively, I believe people need to know who they really are. “Scholars for Truth” and the like do not ask any questions seeking truth, but announce absolute conclusions that the Bush Administration executed a criminal conspiracy to murder 3,000 Americans. Literally, they offer science fiction, not science. Remarkably, many 9/11 conspiracy peddlers spontaneously slander the Jews without rhyme or reason.

At a national conference broadcast nationwide on C-SPAN, key conspiracy leader Alex Jones announced that the American government has already collapsed and a shadow government is now running our country. This radio talk show host next announced — on tape – that Usama Bin Laden is now a paid agent of the CIA.
Professor Steven Jones of Brigham-Young University, accused George Bush of being a dictator, mimicking the preamble of the Declaration of Independence. When asked if violent revolution was necessary, this scientist declared – in front of national TV cameras – that there is no peaceful way to achieve the group’s goals. In the context of the question, Professor Jones was calling for the violent overthrow of the government.

Professor James Fetzer, a Philosophy Professor at the University of Minnesota who poses as a scientist, praised Venezuala President Hugo Chavez and promoted Chavez’s proposal for an international criminal tribunal to put the Bush Administration on trial. By email, Professor Fetzer accused me of being Jewish – sadly, I am not – because I disagree with his theories.

The goal is to convince Americans that there are no foreign enemies. We can all drop our guard. Stop defending America. Don’t be ready to fight. Such “agit-prop” helps America’s enemies to more effectively attack the United States.

First, Al Qaeda has repeatedly admitted planning and executing the 9/11 attacks. In a captured videotape recording a private meeting in November 2001, Usama Bin Laden talks in detail about the 9/11 plot, comparing his expectations in advance to what actually occurred.

End of discussion, right? Nope. The 9/11 conspiracy peddlers reply that Usama Bin Laden is – today – on the payroll of the CIA and the Israeli Mossad. This refers to the current videotapes released now. To explain away Al Qaeda’s proud admission, they ‘out’ Usama Bin Laden as a CIA agent. (Where is Joe Wilson when you need him?) Some also insist that Al Zajeera is a television network operated by Israel, because Qatar lacks technical skills.

Second, of the World Trade Center, Professors Fetzer and Jones insist “there was not enough kinetic energy to cause one floor to bring about the collapse of the floor below it.” Yet about 29 floors tilted and fell onto the crumbling floor where the aircraft gouged out, and removed, support structure. Why would a university professor talk about “one floor” falling when everyone knows that 29 floors, plus 140 tons of aircraft and cargo, fell? Professor Fetzer is intentionally deceiving the gullible. (But I am Jewish, he says, for disagreeing with him.)

Third, Fetzer and Jones argue that the twin towers could have not have collapsed so neatly without a controlled demolition. Architects clarify that any such building is designed to load-shift. The failure of part of a floor causes other parts of that structure to compensate and take up the load. This means that each floor must always fail symmetrically. As long as any part of the floor remains intact, it is designed to pick up the remaining load. Thus, it was inevitable that the twin towers collapsed symmetrically and down the center. Furthermore, controlled demolitions start from the bottom up. The WTC collapse bears no resemblance whatsoever.

Fourth, many conspiracy peddlers insist that no airplanes ever hit the World Trade Center or Pentagon. The airplanes never existed. They refuse to acknowledge that tens of thousands of eyewitnesses went outside and watched the WTC burn before the second airplane hit. News footage was faked, they say, but they do not explain how thousands of journalists and New Yorkers all watched the airplane hit or how dozens of cameras all show the same thing. They ignore how American Airlines crash investigators verified their airplanes from the wreckage in order to file insurance claims and prepare for lawsuits. They do not explain why hundreds of civilian air traffic controllers and airport radar operators confirm the official explanation (indeed, are the sources for much of it). They assume that hundreds of local police and firefighters crawling over the wreckage covered up for the murderers of their fellow firefighters and cops.

Fifth, conspiracy mongers claim that no steel building has ever collapsed from fire alone, so the twin towers couldn’t either. However, the heavy-steel-construction McCormick Place Exhibition Hall collapsed after only 30 minutes of an ordinary fire in Chicago. No physical damage. No jet fuel. Just an ordinary fire softened the steel to the point of structural collapse. And that steel was not carrying the load of 110 floors above it. A dozen other fires in steel buildings have also collapsed floors because the steel softened and buckled. The Hotel Windsor lost its entire upper half in a fire. Clearly the temperature of an ordinary fire can make a steel structure fail.

But, of course, the WTC towers did not collapse from fire alone, but from the severe physical damage of a 140-ton aircraft traveling at 540 MPH shredding the support structures, and the extra weight of 140 tons of aircraft, Incredible temperatures resulted from approximately 30,000 kilograms of jet fuel. But the fireball itself was an enormous, cataclysmic bomb, shattering the building’s interior. They ignore how this fantastic bomb of jet fuel damaged the building. During the ensuing fire, the expansion of steel in 1500 degree fires distorted the building and sheared off bolts and connectors, as the steel expanded, buckled, and warped. Later, a “fuel air bomb” from jet fuel leaking down the elevator shaft shook the entire structure.

Sixth, they engage in pure science fiction about whether the WTC buildings should have collapsed as they did. Such calculations are meaningless because we can never know the actual circumstances: What was the temperature inside? We will never know. Was there substandard construction material? Was the construction perfect? Was there corrosion from the salt air of the ocean during 35 years? Was the architectural design as good as the architects thought?

All such calculations are pure science fiction because there are a hundred variables we can never know. The myth-makers ignore the structural damage from the 1993 bombing. Islamic terrorists had calculated that their truck bomb in the basement garage would bring down the twin towers completely. The towers stood, but with what damage?

Similarly, the myth-makers claim that the twin towers fell at the same rate as objects in free fall. Actually, the towers fell in between 12 and 20 seconds whereas free fall is 9.22 seconds. Dr. Frank Greening’s exhaustive paper demonstrates brilliantly that the twin towers collapse is entirely explainable from gravity alone. Furthermore, how the government can make buildings fall faster (consistent with the news footage) is never well explained.

Seventh, engineers at the Pentagon measured the hole from Flight 77 at 90 feet wide. Yet the fiction-peddlers claim that the hole was only 16 feet wide, based on a French author who has apparently never visited the United States. Conspiracy peddlers argue that a Boeing 757 would have made a hole wider than 16 feet. It did. Yet vast arguments, websites, books, and careers are based on the hole being only 16 feet, instead of the actual 90 feet.

Eighth, other myth-makers point to lists of victims on each flight. They claim that the hijackers are missing from the passenger manifests, which proves that the government slipped the hijackers past security gates. But lists of victims obviously do not include the murderers who killed them.

Ninth, the 9/11 conspiracy peddlers all contradict each other. Collectively, they will claim that there is “overwhelming evidence” against the official explanation of 9/11. However, what is “overwhelming” is a mish-mash of contradictory and mutually-exclusive scenarios. Each of the conspiracy peddlers proves the others wrong. Moreover, the conspiracy theories keep changing. When confronted by the falsehoods and contradictions, they simply change their story. This proves that they are not seeking the truth, but any excuse to bash Bush and America.

In general, conspiracy theorists point to elements of the official explanation they find hard to believe… but then adopt infinitely less believable, preposterous scenarios. Their scenarios do not answer their own questions any better than the official explanation (or even as well). These activists are simply intent on bending the truth, not finding it, to bash George Bush.

The 911truth.org and synicated sites are all scams they are not scientific and areacedemic frauds. Most participants are wofully undereducated about the physical layout of WTC1 and wtc 2 structually or te underground leves that conneccted the two towers onthe 16 acre site. They do n’t wish to understand the truth but wish to bring up fantasy that the sell to others as if it was real. he truth remains as the 911truth.org has proven that they can misrepresentan baseless opinion as truth.
A very small segment of the population believes this nonsense. I happen to know this from polling people myself personally. I’m going to say about 10% of the population which is small but insanely too large believes this nonsense here in America about the New World Order, 911 being an inside job etc.

Then about 5% of this 10% are a bunch of adamant A-holes and trolls about the New World Order and 911 conspiracy’s. It’s a mass delusion actually, and it’s actually very sad. I had a friend that believed this nonsense. His entire family thought he was insane of course. It got so bad he was scared of planes overhead because they might be chem-trails. He even took apart his satellite receiver because he thought there might be a camera in it (which of course there wasn’t “big surprise”).

It’s often interested me to analyze what people believe and why they believe it. After hours of study I can tell you that many of these adamant conspiracy theory promoters are seriously delusional about the world around them (they are living in their own fantasy land so to speak.)

These type of people are ill. I really have nothing else to say about them. I think of myself as prudent observer of society. I just say things how they are. There are two types of people out there in the world. There are those that want the truth, and there are those that DO NOT WANT THE TRUTH.

The 911 so called truther’s are an example of people that don’t want the truth. I think that some of these people don’t REALLY believe that 911 was caused by some massive CIA plot. They say they do, and they act like they do, but they really don’t.

They want to shelter out the obvious truth because it makes them feel better thinking that they know some secret plot; and because nobody wants to admit the U.S. was behind on security and got our asses handed to us by some religious FREAKS!!

This ties in with religion again. IF you look at history most wars have been fought over religion, but the religious don’t want to admit there is anything wrong with religion, so they quickly dismiss that there are any Muslim religious extremists that are causing problems like 911.

Again this ties in with not accepting the truth. You want to believe that when you die you are going to heaven and getting your virgins or whatever.

Haarp project? That’s another nutty thing these people bring up. They call infowars.com and google reputable sources for doing research on something. I seriously don’t think most these people are intelligent enough to step into a library and read something like a peer review journal.

That’s one of the real problems of America today, there is too much misinformation on the internet. People without senses enough to determine what information is valid or not are likely to stumble with things like 911 conspiracies online. Few people these days go to the library and look at a peer review journal by dozens of scientists. People are more interested in conspiracy books and worse THE INTERNET and google. It’s easy to just type a few words on google, read a few articles that already conform to your bias and call it good. Congratulations you’ve done your research.

The internet is an amazing and great place, but every piece of information you look at online, you must take with a grain of salt unless you are going to do hours of research to determine it’s validity. This includes hours of research on who is putting out the information and if they have any financial interest of otherwise in telling you something. Hours of research on opposing viewpoints, and again who is putting out the information on the opposing viewpoints. Then you can have a reasonable opinion or guess as to the truth of a given subject.

If you type in HAARP NWO in google you are going to find articles already reinforcing your nutty opinion about HAARP, even though you’ve probably never seen a HAARP center, or really know anything about it, or talked to anyone involved or working with Haarp if it even exists. If you type in the “Holocaust never happened”, guess what google will come up with? You can get pages supporting that nutty opinion too.

When I talk to 911 truthers they usually can’t defend their arguments, so they get mad at me calling me a sheep, or closing their ears. Or shifting the burden of proof onto me, or bringing up unrelated material into the discussion and not answering my questions.

Think logically about 911 for a second. Planes hitting a tower (weakening not melting) the towers steel beams, coupled with a huge kinetic blast wrecking havoc on the structure, all done by Islamic extremists, VS the other theory(s).

It’s not that hard to believe the planes were hijacked. I remember the time in the 90s when I could carry legally a 4 inch buck knife into the carry on bag on a plane. The conspiracy theory though goes something like this.

The planes were a ruse, the planes were remote controlled and never took off or they were re-routed and the passengers were executed.

A missile was then launched into the Pentagon too, it wasn’t really a plane at all. The calls made by the family members on the plane were really CIA assets faking voices with advanced computer systems. Even though you can talk to the family members of people on the flights like 1911 on facebook they are probably paid off by the CIA too, or part of the CIA as well.

Bombs were placed earlier in the buildings by secret government agents of course, secret shadow agents too. Then thermite which had never been used in controlled demolition previously was planted all around the edges of the beams by shadow agents. It sort of looked like thermite so that must be what it is when a little fire comes off the side of the building.

The only people who talk about melting steel are the conspiracy theorists by the way, everyone else is content with weakened beams.

“Let’s pretend it was an inside job, why go to all this trouble of faking voices, faking phone calls, using planes, etc etc? If you recall in the 90s al qaeda tried to blow up the buildings from the basement? IF the building was rigged with explosives AGAIN they could have just blown it down and blamed it on al qaeda so we could go to war couldn’t they? That would have been more than sufficient as people remember al qaeda from the 90s trying to blow it up with explosives to begin with.

Why all the elaborate excess of using planes, thermite, faking voices, CIA agents, missles? etc?? I have yet to get a good answer from him or any other truthers on this for that matter. It’s all BS.

All they do is nit pick on the fact that one scientist or engineer or article says this that and this. They won’t answer your question(s), when the truth is 95% of engineers agree almost unanimously on what happened that day. I don’t need to nit pick.

I post this for those who have sense enough, but I’m not going to waste time arguing with a conspiracy theorist. One thing you will notice about people like that if you argue with them you are either A) duped by the conspirators or B) somehow part of the conspiracy. You’re wasting your time.

The best thing you can do with insane people that believe things like this, is to actually not argue at all. In my time around insane people I have found the best tactic to cope with insanity is to nod your head a little bit, and say something like “that’s interesting”.

If you argue with them that reinforces their beliefs more, and if you say you’re right they’ll keep talking about it. It’s best to stay neutral. Say something like “that’s interesting”, or “Oh, I never thought about that” and leave it at that.