[ChemTrail Tracking USA] Digest Number 6574

Messages In This Digest (12 Messages)

1a.

Re: Weather Mods From: Susan Lervold

1b.

Re: Weather Mods From: perryo28

1c.

Weather Mods From: jean baugh

1d.

Re: Weather Mods From: Roberta LaCasse

1e.

Re: Weather Mods From: Lyn

2a.

Re: trees and flag poles in AZ From: Susan Lervold

3a.

Re: stealthsite From: G - DAWG

3b.

Re: stealthsite From: jrd

3c.

Re: stealthsite From: Susan Lervold

3d.

Re: stealthsite From: bcolemanconroy8

4.1.

Messages

1a.

Re: Weather Mods

Posted by: "Susan Lervold" susanlervold@gmail.com sushieq@rocketmail.com

Thu May 31, 2012 5:39 am (PDT)

Our skies here in Orange County, CA have been cloudless and blue for a
couple of weeks now. After months of heavy chem-haze, I'm suspicious.
Something's up, for sure.
From: *
[mailto:* On Behalf Of jrd
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 3:52 PM
To: *

Subject:  Weather Mods
The weatherman on TV can't keep you these days. For years they get the
weather wrong when they don't see the storms blowing up before they get to
my area. Or saying there are storms coming for several days, but never show
up.
Lately, the weather changes before the weatherman tell us about it. Right
now there is a storm coming on my weather maps, still a hundred miles away,
that they are not even broadcasting it about!
The sky looks like it is not normal, but has a even strange light blue with
no clouds over head. I can tell the sky is faked because the sun is being
masked, the sun is not bright enough.

1b.

Re: Weather Mods

Posted by: "perryo28" perronu@trip.net perryo28

Thu May 31, 2012 10:45 am (PDT)

The situation is the same up here in the central Sierra; over the last 4 weeks we've had only 2 days (5/10,11) of spraying, the rest of the time has been blue skies, with a couple cloudy/rainy days a week ago. It's strange that the spraying stopped so abruptly after being so prevalent the last few months. I agree, something must be up.
--- In chemtrailtrackingusa@yahoogroups.com, "Susan Lervold" <susanlervold@...> wrote:
>
> Our skies here in Orange County, CA have been cloudless and blue for a
> couple of weeks now. After months of heavy chem-haze, I'm suspicious.
> Something's up, for sure.
>
>
>
>1c.

Weather Mods

Posted by: "jean baugh" oldglory@bigcountry.net emily_baugh

Thu May 31, 2012 5:53 pm (

PDT)

Hi,
Maybe, just maybe, it penetrated their stupid heads, they have to breathe
the same air?!
Same thing here, the spraying is erratic and not as much on a semi daily
basis. Considering the boonie area here, I'm surprised they would even
waste their time in the first place.
Jean
***************
> From: perryo28 <perronu@trip.net>
> Reply-To: <*

>
> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 17:28:19 -0000
> To: *
> Subject: Re: Weather Mods
>
>
> The situation is the same up here in the central Sierra; over the last 4 weeks
> we've had only 2 days (5/10,11) of spraying, the rest of the time has been
> blue skies, with a couple cloudy/rainy days a week ago. It's strange that the
> spraying stopped so abruptly after being so prevalent the last few months. I
> agree, something must be up.
>
>
> --- In * "Susan Lervold"
> <susanlervold@...> wrote:
>>
>> Our skies here in Orange County, CA have been cloudless and blue for a
>> couple of weeks now. After months of heavy chem-haze, I'm suspicious.
>> Something's up, for sure.
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
> 1d.

Re: Weather Mods

Posted by: "Roberta LaCasse" roberta.lacasse@gmail.com roberta.lacasse

Thu May 31, 2012 5:54 pm (PDT)

*Beautiful, amazingly BEAUTIFUL blue skies here in central CT today also!
I honestly never thought I would get the chance to see it again....it's
been a long time in the haze....
*
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Susan Lervold <susanlervold@gmail.com>wrote:
> **
>
>
> Our skies here in Orange County, CA have been cloudless and blue for a
> couple of weeks now. After months of heavy chem-haze, I’m suspicious.
> Something’s up, for sure.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* *

to: *On Behalf Of *jrd
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 30, 2012 3:52 PM
> *To:*
> *Subject:*  Weather Mods****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> The weatherman on TV can't keep you these days. For years they get the
> weather wrong when they don't see the storms blowing up before they get to
> my area. Or saying there are storms coming for several days, but never
> show up.****
>
> ****
>
> Lately, the weather changes before the weatherman tell us about it. Right
> now there is a storm coming on my weather maps, still a hundred miles
> away, that they are not even broadcasting it about!****
>
> ****
>
> The sky looks like it is not normal, but has a even strange light blue
> with no clouds over head. I can tell the sky is faked because the sun
> is being masked, the sun is not bright enough. ****
>
> ****
>
>
>1e.

Re: Weather Mods

Posted by: "Lyn" returntogodsgarden@yahoo.com returntogodsgarden

Thu May 31, 2012 6:27 pm (PDT)

Today, North Central Pennsylvania - afternoon of heavy chemtrailng. Days when it hasn't rained in past week - ground to sky gray blue haze very evident in short distances, but can't see it right before your eyes. Very polluted "looking" at a distance is best description.
The particulates whether visible to us or not are always there in the atmosphere so matter how lovely it looks to us there really isn't true improvement we just dont see evidence of the ops.
If they stopped worldwide chemtrailing right this very moment, how long do people think it would take before we could restore our atmosphere and environment to some semblance of it's pre-chemtrails state? Is that even possible.
When they stop ops in multiple states for short periods out of the normal season changes we are used to one wonders what special things they may be prepping for during that time.
Interesting how the perception of the skies can be so different just a few states away. Maybe they are diverting some of those NWO bucks from chemtrails ops into more diverse military preparations as we get that much closer to an official police state?

2a.

Re: trees and flag poles in AZ

Posted by: "Susan Lervold" susanlervold@gmail.com sushieq@rocketmail.com

Thu May 31, 2012 5:42 am (PDT)

I'd noticed that we have waaaaay more towers than we need here (So. CA),
too.like eight (that we can see), all in nearly a row, along an
approximately two mile stretch of freeway. And, like I said, those are just
the visible ones.
From: *
[mailto:*

] On Behalf Of bcolemanconroy8
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 8:40 PM
To: *
Subject: trees and flag poles in AZ
http://www.stealthsite.com/products/trees-poles/ we have far too many of
these structures in AZ to be cell phone towers and those are only the towers
we can see. All the pretty ways to give EMF a boost. I was looking at older
archives and re-found the url.

 

3a.

Re: stealthsite

Posted by: "G - DAWG" canaryrider@yahoo.com canaryrider

Thu May 31, 2012 3:52 pm (PDT)

Check this out:
http://www.celltowerinfo.com/CellTowerLocationMapsIndex.htm
From G PRAIRIE-DAWG
(If you ain't the lead dog, the view never changes.)
--- On Wed, 5/30/12, bcolemanconroy8 <bcolemanconroy8@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: bcolemanconroy8 <bcolemanconroy8@yahoo.com>
Subject:  stealthsite
To: *

Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012, 10:28 PM
 
Amazing variety, to think this was back in 2005!
http://www.stealthsite.com/

3b.

Re: stealthsite

Posted by: "jrd" datapros@netins.net jrd4858

Thu May 31, 2012 5:55 pm (PDT)

Something I have always wondered is how all the cell phone companies put up all the
towers so fast. For these towers to go up so fast there had to be a lot of money from
somewhere.
The NWO likes to say we are the problem and ruining the earth because we use up so
much resources. If the NWO money had not been used to make cell phones, we would not
be putting all this metal up and our lives would be better.
The NWO will use us until it fits their purpose, then they will get rid of us. Unless we get
rid of them first.
I would bet if a person took all the physical materials in the world, the stuff that is kind of
hidden financially and unknown to the public, you would find the international bankers
gets a large share of the money.
Everytime the international bankers, through the World bank, loan all those dollars to the 3rd
world countries that they can not repay, the international bankers get the collateral. Usually
this is the natural resources of the countries. Vast tracks of land or mineral rich ground.
We know the international bankers have increased their share of holdings everytime they create a
collapse or recession.
Since the financial crisis, the top 10 banks in the USA hold 77% of all loaned assets!
----- Original Message -----
From: G - DAWG
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 4:09 PM
Subject: Re:  stealthsite
Check this out:
http://www.celltowerinfo.com/CellTowerLocationMapsIndex.htm
From G PRAIRIE-DAWG
(If you ain't the lead dog, the view never changes.)
--- On Wed, 5/30/12, bcolemanconroy8 <bcolemanconroy8@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: bcolemanconroy8 <bcolemanconroy8@yahoo.com>
Subject: stealthsite
To: 
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012, 10:28 PM
Amazing variety, to think this was back in 2005!
http://www.stealthsite.com/

 

3c.

Re: stealthsite

Posted by: "Susan Lervold" susanlervold@gmail.com sushieq@rocketmail.com

Thu May 31, 2012 5:57 pm (PDT)

Well, the map certainly explains the multitude of towers I see in my area. Good grief, I had no idea there were so many! Unbelievable. Right up there with all the new “traffic” cameras posted at every intersection and freeway on/off ramp.
From:

[mailto: On Behalf Of G - DAWG
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:10 PM
To: 
Subject:  stealthsite
Check this out:
http://www.celltowerinfo.com/CellTowerLocationMapsIndex.htm
From G PRAIRIE-DAWG
(If you ain't the lead dog, the view never changes.)

 

3d.

Re: stealthsite

Posted by: "bcolemanconroy8" bcolemanconroy8@yahoo.com bcolemanconroy8

Thu May 31, 2012 6:39 pm (PDT)

Keep in mind these are GWEN towers owned by shadow entity, they used to
be called Gwen towers but now the new name is always cell towers. Cell
phones use these towers but they are not the only purse paying for the
usage, physical maintenance or construction. Cell phone companies pay
service fees for usage but the rest falls to what would be under the
umbrella of ground wave emergency network. What extended or future
purpose of these structures will include is right out of science fiction
~ but it will be real. FCC uses these structures too ~ not only HAM
communication
--- In * , "jrd" <datapros@...> wrote:
>
> Something I have always wondered is how all the cell phone companies
put up all the
> towers so fast. For these towers to go up so fast there had to be a
lot of money from
> somewhere.
>
> The NWO likes to say we are the problem and ruining the earth because
we use up so
> much resources. If the NWO money had not been used to make cell
phones, we would not
> be putting all this metal up and our lives would be better.
>
> The NWO will use us until it fits their purpose, then they will get
rid of us. Unless we get
> rid of them first.
>
> I would bet if a person took all the physical materials in the world,
the stuff that is kind of
> hidden financially and unknown to the public, you would find the
international bankers
> gets a large share of the money.
>
> Everytime the international bankers, through the World bank, loan all
those dollars to the 3rd
> world countries that they can not repay, the international bankers get
the collateral. Usually
> this is the natural resources of the countries. Vast tracks of land or
mineral rich ground.
>
> We know the international bankers have increased their share of
holdings every time they create a
> collapse or recession.
>
> Since the financial crisis, the top 10 banks in the USA hold 77% of
all loaned assets!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: G - DAWG
> Check this out:
>
> http://www.celltowerinfo.com/CellTowerLocationMapsIndex.htm
<http://www.celltowerinfo.com/CellTowerLocationMapsIndex.htm>
>
> From G PRAIRIE-DAWG
>
>
> --- On Wed, 5/30/12, bcolemanconroy8 bcolemanconroy8@... wrote:
> Amazing variety, to think this was back in 2005!
>
> http://www.stealthsite.com/ <http://www.stealthsite.com/>
>

 

 

The many thing to note when members of the Group mention NOW the cannot specify whom the they and them are  the never state names when creating a strawman argument.

They have yet to explain how rate of dispersal from over 7 miles up effects the exposure rate at sea level r ground level.