Secrecy News: December 7, 2020

 

Secrecy News: December 7, 2020
View this email in your browser

SECRECY NEWS
From the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2020, Issue No. 16
December 7, 2020

Secrecy News Blog:  https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/


**    JASON SCIENCE ADVISORY PANEL ENDURES
**    DOD LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO BE PUBLISHED


JASON SCIENCE ADVISORY PANEL ENDURES


Having survived a Pentagon attempt to terminate it, the JASON panel that performs independent technical assessments for government agencies now seems set for a period of relative stability.

Last year Mike Griffin, then-Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering), abruptly 
refused to renew his Office's sponsorship of the JASONs, and the panel was temporarily taken over by the National Nuclear Security Administration under then-Administrator Lisa Gordon-Hagerty.

In response, 
Congress directed the Department of Defense to engage the JASONs "on an ongoing basis, on matters involving science, technology, and national security, including methods to defeat existential and technologically-amplified threats to national security."

Despite that clear directive, DoD requested no funding at all for the JASONs in the current fiscal year. So the House added $3 million to cover overhead costs for the JASONs and the money was in fact authorized in the pending 
defense authorization act for fiscal year 2021 that is expected to pass this week.

The Department of Defense recently indicated that it would 
solicit competitive bids for administrative and management support to the JASONs, which is currently provided by the MITRE Corporation. ("Pentagon's Advisory Group, JASON, Survives Another Competition," by Robert Levinson, Bloomberg Government, December 1).

The demand for the sort of 
independent evaluations that the JASONs produce is limited. Unlike many other government advisory panels, the JASONs insist on selecting their own members. That means that their studies cannot be skewed by appointing political allies or persons of dubious qualifications, as the Trump Administration has done lately with the Defense Business Board. Their expertise and independence does not guarantee that they will be right or effective, but the JASONs offer a kind of integrity that is increasingly absent from other such panels.

The majority of JASON products are classified or otherwise restricted from public release. One recent unclassified report that was done by the JASONs for the Census Bureau discussed ways to employ secure computation technologies to increase the usage and the utility of datasets held by the Bureau. See Secure Computation for Business Data, November 23, 2020.

Another recent report offered suggestions to the National Science Foundation on how to mitigate the effects of large constellations of orbiting satellites on ground-based astronomical observations. See 
Impacts of Large Satellite Constellations on Optical Astronomy, September 10, 2020.

These and other 
JASON reports are moderately dense and technical and may not attract a large audience. But interested readers will often find them stimulating and informative.


DOD LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO BE PUBLISHED

After failing to publicly disclose its proposed legislative agenda, the Department of Defense will soon be required to do so.


Each year DoD generates proposals for legislative actions that it would like to see incorporated in the coming year's national defense authorization act. These may include tweaks to existing statutes, requests for relief from reporting requirements, or something more ambitious.

It used to be the case — until two years ago — that those legislative proposals were routinely posted on the website of the DoD 
Office of Legislative Counsel where they could be publicly examined and evaluated. Then, without explanation, DoD stopped posting them.

Last spring, one of DoD's more far-reaching but publicly undisclosed proposals sought to rescind a requirement to produce an unclassified version of the Future Years Defense Program budget document. (
Secrecy News, 03/30/20),

That proposal was not adopted in the House-Senate conference version of the FY2021 defense authorization act (
HR 6395).

But Congress did adopt a provision (sec. 1059) crafted by Reps. Katie Porter and Jackie Speier that will now require DoD to publish its legislative proposals online within 21 days of their transmission to Congress.

*    *    *

Last month, the Departments of Energy and Defense denied a request from the Federation of American Scientists to disclose the current size of the U.S. nuclear arsenal and the number of warheads that have been dismantled. Such information had previously been declassified and published by the executive branch each year through 2017. But for now it remains classified. See "Trump Administration Again Refuses To Disclose Nuclear Weapons Stockpile Size" by Hans Kristensen, FAS Strategic Security, December 3.

_____________________________________

Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News Blog is at:
     https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
     https://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.html

To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
     https://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.html

OR email your request to saftergood@fas.org

Secrecy News is also archived at:
     https://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html

Support the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation:
     https://fas.org/donate/

_______________________
Steven Aftergood
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
web:    https://fas.org/sgp/index.html
email:  saftergood@fas.org
voice:  (202)454-4691
twitter:  @saftergood

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Awareness of EBE Contact

The Mystery of Rh-Negative Blood Genetic Origin Unknown

American Airlines Flight 77 Evidence