Mandala and fractal thinking in Southeast Asia and the Pacific

LiveJournal Tags:

The term "mandala" is often used in scholarly literature to describe the polities, the temple architecture and other aspects of Southeast Asian culture.  The same word could be extended into the cultures of the Pacific where both mandala and fractal types of thinking also prevail.
A mandala again, in this analysis, is a way of viewing or representing the cosmos, or a part of the cosmos seen as the whole in microcosm.  The term fractal refers to a geometric shape that can be broken into fragments that are copies or approximations of the whole.  In sociology and ethnology, the term fractal applies to ways of visualizing the cosmos as consisting of parts that are smaller copies or approximations of the whole -- the macrocosm.
Indeed, in Southeast Asia and Oceania, one can view the entire culture from polities and family relationships to iconography and orality through the prism of the mandala and the fractal. Such concepts are defining in identifying what is indigenous in these regions.
Fractal Cosmos, Fractal Person, Distributed Person
Thomas Reuter in Sharing the Earth, Dividing the Land: Land and Territory in the Austronesian World describes Austronesian society using indigenous metaphors that relate the self and the community to trees and other plants.

Botanic metaphors are among the most commonly used metaphors for social relationships in the Austronesian world. The source ancestor of a clan or founding clan of a village, for example, may be referred to as the ‘trunk’ or ‘root’ and his descendant or newcomer clients as the ‘leaves’ or ‘tips’ of the same tree. Similarly in a topogeny, the place of origin is usually the ritual centre or ‘trunk’ of the domain, to which a path of origin is ceremonially traced back along one or several ‘branch’ villages, beginning from the newest settlements or ‘tips’. The people who reside at, or in some other way can lay claim to, the origin site tend to maintain a position of ritual precedence or of political authority in the domain, but rarely both. Botanic metaphors generally suggest a segmentary process of spatial expansion due to organic growth from within, but can and are applied also within local societies featuring a population with multiple origins

....an underlying Austronesian territorial concept that envisages a shared social identity based on a specific ‘foundation event’. Many Gumai villages in the South Sumatran highlands are thought to have been established by, and thus trace their ‘origin’ to, a single ancestor, the puyang Ketunggalan Dusun. Villages contained a small ancestor house (lunjuk or rumah puyang) for the spirits of the founding ancestors, where rituals would be held to commemorate the village origins. The morpheme pu in puyang could be a reflex of puqun, which is a Proto-Malayo-Polynesian reconstruction meaning ‘tree’, ‘trunk’, ‘base’ or ‘source’. Villages are inhabited by the descendants of the puyang and their affines. The population is divided into origin groups called jungkuk which are ranked in order of precedence based on birth order and ritual seniority.


The idea of the "trunk" and the "tip" takes on fractal dimensions as Mark S. Mosko points out in "The Fractal Yam: Botanical Imagery and Human Agency in the Trobriands":

As Jim Fox and his collaborators on the Comparative Austronesian Project have amply demonstrated, the arboreal idiom of ‘base’, ‘branch’ and ‘tip’ animates the origin structures of precedence of many if not most societies of the Austronesian world...Based on recent ethnographic enquires at Omarakana, the site of Malinowski’s original fieldwork, this paper argues that the sequential recursiveness of base-branch-tip across North Kiriwinan contexts is fractally structured – borrowing a notion from chaos theory. The production of every ‘tip’, in other words, becomes the condition or ‘base’ of further base-branch-tip transformation, and so on.


The generation of self-similarity at every new tip applies quite broadly not only to Austronesian society, but also to the other non-Austronesian societies in the region.
In Kapampangan culture, the trunk or source is known as pun, which can also mean the chief or leader, who in ancient times was likely a "fractal chief."  One's relatives or siblings can be known as capsi from the word apsi "small branches."  Bergano defines capsi as "el un hermano, o pariente porque vienen de un tronco."  The "tronco" or 'trunk" here again is the pun.
The most ancient ruler was likely the clan leader, or pun, who like the latter chiefs, kings and emperors was seen as a personification of the community, kingdom or world, and like the original Cosmic Being was expected to "distribute" him or herself, at least ritually, to his or her followers.
According to Bergano, the opposite of pun is sepu -- a word referring among other things to the tip of a leaf.  The word sepu can also mean "history" as in one's clan history, the history of a village or nation, or history in general.  From this word, Bergano mentions the derived form casesepuan "ultimisimo de la historia" (the last part of  history), which might also be related to one of his definitions for the word suku as "the end of time."


The Rurutu deity Tangaroa or A'a represents the "Fractal Person" at the cosmic level -- the pantheistic concept of the cosmos as a person or other microcosmic form that generates similar smaller forms in the "creation" of the cosmos.  In the sculpture above, A'a generates other deities and humans as his eyes, nose, knees, etc. (Source: http://detoursdesmondes.typepad.com/dtours_des_mondes/anthropologie_de_lart/)


The depiction of frac tal thinking appears quite early in this region.  For example, the Lapita motif below, dated to about 1000 BCE, shows "face" motifs that are believed to have been widely used by the Lapita culture.

Source: http://picasaweb.google.com/JTeddyT/LapitaFace?authkey=Gv1sRgCMfAr6DEpafBVg&feat=flashslideshow#5221186924082589314
The image above shows both larger and smaller face motifs as demonstrated below.


You can also rotate the image 180 degrees to double many of the face images.  Note that the highly stylized face motif that borders this "mandala" creates many face images. Click on image for larger view.




The image to the left is taken from Art and Agency showing Marquesan tattoos with "hand faces."


From Art and Agency, tattoos and mask showing mata hoata "faces," and ipu "eyes."


Mata hoata faces on leg, from the Marquesas. For more images, see: http://www.flickr.com/photos/runningafterantelope/sets/72157608481767555/


Variations of the etua motif (squatting figure motif, etua = deity, deified ancestor) from the Marquesas showing the number of ways the local artists could represent the "Distributed Person."


Fractal tortoise
Knots, knotted cords and carvings with knots are also used to portray the interconnected objects/persons in the family, community or world.  Some examples are the Malangan sculptures of New Ireland and the to'o knots of Tahiti. 

</F ont>

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Awareness of EBE Contact

The Mystery of Rh-Negative Blood Genetic Origin Unknown

American Airlines Flight 77 Evidence